This week I have met with my site-supervisor, arrived at a consensus and revised my plan. I encourage all interested parties to provide me with suitable feedback.Your comments are appreciated. The following is the revised plan:

Action Planning Template
Goal: The Problem: How might we provide better instructional support for teachers to effectively utilize and embrace technology in the classroom? Rationale: The main objective of this action research project will be to improve our campus School Technology and Readiness [STaR] chart rating in the area of Instructional Support. The concern is that teachers are not confident and/or motivated to utilize technology in the delivery of their lessons. This research will seek ways to understand the qualitative issues as well as demonstrate quantitatively why technology in the classroom is vital to student and teacher success.
Action Steps(s):	Person(s) Responsible:	Timeline: Start/End	Needed Resources	Evaluation
Set a foundation by informally discussing my research goals with other teachers and informing them that I will need their help to successfully complete this research. Interview Jana Cash & Debi Gier. Try to acquire questions from STaR chart regarding Instructional Support.	Dennis Rowe	February 2012—March 2012	Informal meetings with teachers involved in research group	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation
Analyze the data on the STaR chart	Dennis Rowe	March 2012—April 2012	Current STaR chart results	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation
Develop a deeper understanding by listening to teachers describe problems and reasons they are not utilizing technology in their lessons	Dennis Rowe	April 2012 – May 2012	Teacher input	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation
Engage in self-reflection by documenting how often I utilize technology in my classes and the different kinds of technology I use	Dennis Rowe	May 2012 – June 2012	Lesson plans, self-observation, PDAS evaluations	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation
Explore patterns in the use of technology in the classroom (e.g., older teachers vs. younger teachers, core subjects vs. electives, and department vs. department)	Dennis Rowe	June 2012 – July 2012	Internet, current STaR chart results, teacher input	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation
Determine direction for campus based on findings from inquiry	Site-Supervisor and Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee	July 2012 – August 2012	Current STaR chart results, teacher input, findings from quantitative and qualitative data gathered	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, findings from quantitative and qualitative data gathered
Take action by assigning department heads to monitor and encourage implementation of technology by all teachers in each department on a regular basis. Also, plan appropriate technology training as staff development to increase comfort level of teachers	Principal and Department heads	August 2012 – September 2012	Internet, current STaR chart results, teacher input, findings from data, decision of Campus SBDM Committee	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation, reports from department heads to principal
Sustain improvement by following up with department heads to ensure compliance of technology utilization and look for ways to anticipate future technology needs/upgrades	Principal	Ongoing following implementation of plan	STaR chart results, teacher input, student/parent input	Site-Supervisor, Campus Site-Based Decision Making Committee, STaR chart, classroom observation